From Qur’anic worldview to teacher creativity
A conceptual framework of internalised leadership, psychological empowerment, and psychological safety
Keywords:
Qur’anic worldview , educational leadership, educational administration, psychological conditions, organizational conditionsAbstract
Teacher creativity is increasingly recognized as important for educational innovation, problem solving, and improved learning outcomes. While existing research has examined teacher creativity through organizational, leadership, and psychological perspectives, comparatively limited attention has been given to how a Qur’anic worldview may shape the internal orientation of educational leaders and influence the conditions that support teacher creativity. This article develops a conceptual framework that explains how Qur’anic leadership principles may operate through leaders’ internal orientations and leadership practices to create organizational and psychological conditions conducive to teacher creativity. The framework is developed through a conceptual synthesis of Qur’anic evidence, Islamic leadership scholarship, and established theories of psychological empowerment, self-determination, intrinsic motivation, and creativity. The resulting model proposes a pathway from Qur’anic worldview and leadership principles to internal leadership orientation, leadership practices, teachers’ psychological empowerment and motivation, and ultimately teacher creativity and educational outcomes. The framework contributes theoretically by positioning Qur’anic leadership not simply as the application of selected Qur’anic values to administrative behavior, but as a process in which Qur’anic principles concerning authority, responsibility, justice, consultation, trust, and human development inform the leader’s internal orientation and subsequent organizational practices. The framework further proposes that such practices may create conditions associated with autonomy, meaningful participation, competence, trust, and motivation, which contemporary psychological research identifies as relevant to creative behavior. The article therefore provides a theoretically grounded bridge between Qur’anic worldview, leadership psychology, organizational conditions, and teacher creativity. Its practical implication is that educational leadership informed by a Qur’anic worldview may offer an alternative normative foundation for cultivating environments supportive of teacher creativity. However, the upstream relationships between Qur’anic worldview and leaders’ internal orientations are conceptual propositions rather than empirically validated relationships, and the proposed framework therefore requires empirical testing.
Downloads
References
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1995). Prolegomena to the metaphysics of Islam: An exposition of the fundamental elements of the worldview of Islam. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.
Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1982a). Al-Tawhid: Its implications for thought and life. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1982b). Islamization of knowledge: General principles and work plan. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Beekun, R. I., & Badawi, J. A. (1999). Leadership: An Islamic perspective. Amana Publications.
Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1994). Promoting self-determined education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 38(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383940380101
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2012). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/256657
Qur’an. (2004). The Qur’an (M. A. S. Abdel Haleem, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995a). An empirical test of a comprehensive model of intrapersonal empowerment in the workplace. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 601–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506984
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995b). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Salim Saif Ali Al Mamari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
