Rethinking leadership effectiveness in education

Empirical validation of Reddin’s Three-Dimensional Leadership Theory among educational supervisors

Authors

  • Said Khalfan Ahmed Al Mayyahi Department of Education and Humanities, University of Nizwa, Sultanate of Oman

Keywords:

Reddin’s Three-Dimensional Leadership Theory, educational supervision, leadership effectiveness, task orientation, relationship orientation, Oman

Abstract

Educational leadership effectiveness remains a central concern in contemporary educational research due to its influence on teacher development, organizational improvement, and the quality of educational practices. While recent leadership studies have emphasized transformational, instructional, and distributed leadership approaches, classical contingency theories continue to provide valuable perspectives for understanding how leadership behaviours contribute to organizational effectiveness. This study examined the applicability of Reddin’s Three-Dimensional Leadership Theory among educational supervisors in the Sultanate of Oman by investigating the dimensions of task orientation, relationship orientation, and leadership effectiveness. A quantitative survey design was employed among 291 senior teachers selected through stratified random sampling from schools across four educational governorates in Oman. Data were analyzed using reliability analysis and construct validity procedures to examine the measurement quality and theoretical structure of the leadership instrument. The findings demonstrated excellent internal consistency for the overall leadership scale and its three dimensions. Strong relationships were also identified among task orientation, relationship orientation, and leadership effectiveness, providing empirical support for Reddin’s multidimensional leadership perspective. The study contributes to educational leadership scholarship by demonstrating the continued relevance of contingency-based leadership theory within an Arab educational context and by emphasizing that leadership should be evaluated not only through observable behaviours but also through their effectiveness in achieving meaningful educational outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd al-Jawad, H. A. H., Sulayman, S., Basim Abd al-Nasir Ahmad, & Ni‘mat. (2025). Al-qiyadah al-ibda‘iyyah wa ‘alaqatuha bi al-tanmiyah al-mihniyyah li-mu‘allimi al-ta‘lim al-Azhari. Al-Majallah al-Tarbawiyyah li-Ta‘lim al-Kibar, 7(4), 144–173.

Al-Mayyahi, S. K. A. (2022). Transformational leadership styles of educational supervisors and their relationship with teachers’ organizational commitment in the Sultanate of Oman [Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia].

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill.

Fleishman, E. A. (1953). The description of supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056314

Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How Principals Affect Students and Schools: A Systematic Synthesis of Two Decades of Research. The Wallace Foundation.

Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244793

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership Revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22.

Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. McGraw-Hill.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Reddin, W. J. (1970). Managerial effectiveness. McGraw-Hill.

Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 35–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1948.9917362

Yukl, G. (2020). Leadership in organizations (9th ed.). Pearson.

Yusuf al-Sumayrat, B. (2023). Muharrikat al-qiyadah al-raqamiyyah lada qadat al-madaris fi zill al-ta‘allum ‘an bu‘d: Dirasah tatbiqiyyah ‘ala qadat al-madaris fi muhafazah al-Karak. Majallat Kulliyyat al-Tarbiyah (Asyut), 39(7), 188–205.

Downloads

Published

31-08-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Al Mayyahi, S. K. A. (2026). Rethinking leadership effectiveness in education: Empirical validation of Reddin’s Three-Dimensional Leadership Theory among educational supervisors. Journal of Advanced Islamic and Legal Research, 3(2), 48-60. https://ailrjournal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/45

Similar Articles

1-10 of 12

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.